Amidst the law that was legislated five administrations ago, some buildings still violate the Batasang Pambansa 344 that facilitates people with disabilities (PWDs) inside them.
Ferdinand Rañosa, an architect from the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH 11), disclosed that there are private building owners who still violate the code. They would have their plans checked by the City Engineer’s Office (CEO) but would not implement them.
In a nutshell, the BP 344 is meant to “enhance the mobility of persons with disabilities by requiring certain buildings, institutions, establishments, and public utilities to install facilities and other devices.” Established last December 7, 1982 and approved last February 25, 1983, it has “no clear sanctions for [its] violators” till today although the CEO can cancel the latter’s certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion once its office is violated.
There are bills that have remained as bills even though they were proposed since the 15th Congress of the Philippines.
Filed last June 6, 2012 by Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano, the “Children with Special Needs Education Fund Act of 2012” (SBN 3226) was drafted to increase the Special Education Fund received by the special education centers. It would be pooled from the proceeds of the additional real property tax plus a certain portion of the taxes on Virginia-type cigarettes and imported leaf tobacco.
It was last October 17, 2012, on the other hand, that Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV suggested to give the country’s national athletes, coaches and trainers with disabilities with the same benefits that the “normal” athletes who win in international competitions receive. He was eventually joined by Sen. Pia S. Cayetano, Sen. Francis “Chiz” G. Escudero, Sen. Manny B. Villar, and Sen. Manuel “Lito” M. Lapid. Sen. Vicente C. Sotto III supported the bill at first but abstained from it when the bill was approved on the second reading with certain amendments last February 6, 2013.
A bill to protect those afflicted with HIV and AIDS was also passed as well as about one requiring operators of television shows, home video programs, and motion pictures to broadcast with closed captions.
As of this writing, there is still no current information how many PWDs are benefiting from the regulations favoring in the Philippines and how many of them can access public tertiary education and hospitals.
“The Philippines has a legal obligation to promote and protect the rights of persons with disabilities.” ~ Handicap International